Analysis of Islamic law about KPPU verdict No. 10/ KPPU-i/2015 : monopoly practices and unfair business competition imported cattle trade in Jabodetabek

Rosidah, Noor (2018) Analysis of Islamic law about KPPU verdict No. 10/ KPPU-i/2015 : monopoly practices and unfair business competition imported cattle trade in Jabodetabek. Undergraduate (S1) thesis, UIN Walisongo.

[img]
Preview
Text
132311016.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) has made a decision for the offense of Indonesian Republic Constitution Number 5 of 1999 about Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition Prohibition. This action is against the clause 11 Indonesian Republic Constitution No. 5 of 1999 and 19 (c) Indonesian Republic Constitution No. 5 of 1999. In this case, the accused are PT Sumber Cipta Kencana with fines Rp.71.414.000,- and CV Mitra Agro Sampurna with fines Rp.967.626.000,-. The writer has an analysis of this decision, both of legal analysis (Formal and Materil Aspect s ) and Islamic analysis. In Islamic analysis, PT Sumber Cipta Kencana and CV Mitra Agro Sampurna was against the ethical and business principals in Islamic religion with muʿāmalāt rules included. The type of this research is library research and the writer focuses on normative juridical approach. The next, the writer analyzed in qualitative. Based on the writer analysis, it can be concluded that the legal in Formal Aspect has already been appropriate with the rules. But, in the Material Aspect , the punishment is lower than minimum determination. The writer suggestion that the punishment must be more than heaviness, because the easiness factors are relieved the accused and appropriateness with the council facts. Moreover, the clauses are offensed by the accused include the principal criminal. While in Islamic law perspective, that the actions of PT Sumber Cipta Kencana and CV Mitra Agro Sampurna were included to the Sharia forbids, because of an offense about the ethical and the business Islam principals. Action by the accused were classified as the forbidden action in Prophet period and include the Ihtikār. This action have a similarity and the negative impacts as below 1) make a scarcity things 2) make the prices more expensive 3) across the regulations and of course make discommodity in the society.

[error in script]
Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate (S1))
Contributors:
ContributionContributors (e.g. Thesis Advisor)Email
Thesis advisorJunaidi, Akhmad ArifUNSPECIFIED
Thesis advisorSolek, MohammadUNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords: Hukum ekonomi Islam; Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU); Impor binatang ternak; Monopoli
Subjects: 200 Religion (Class here Comparative religion) > 290 Other religions > 297 Islam and religions originating in it > 297.2 Islam Doctrinal Theology, Aqaid and Kalam > 297.27 Islam and social sciences > 297.273 Islam and economics
Divisions: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum > Muamalah
Depositing User: Mohamad Akyas
Date Deposited: 21 Aug 2018 07:43
Last Modified: 21 Aug 2018 07:43
URI: http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/8144

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item