Data hisab yang dihasilkan oleh Mujab di Jepara menghasilkan tinggi hilal sebesar 1,5° dan hilal terlihat diantara kabut tebal. Setelah mendengarkan keterangan kesaksian oleh Mujab hal ini dianggap sudah sesuai dengan hukum acara yang ada meskipun diprotes oleh banyak pihak. Di sisi lain, terdapat dua orang santri Al-Husainiyah di Cakung yang menggunakan metode hisab dari Kitab al-Sulam al-Nayyirain menghasilkan ketinggian hilal 3°,dan hilal terlihat dari hal tersebut mengasilkan dua pertanyaan 1. Mengetahui tinjauan Hukumah mengenai hasil rukyat akhir Ramadan tahun 2011 M/1432 H di Jepara dan Cakung 2. Mengetahui Bagaimana tinjauan Astronomi mengenai hasil rukyat akhir Ramadan tahun 2011 M/1432 H di Jepara dan Cakung
Jenis penelitian ini adalah kualitatif. Dalam penelitian ini penulis melakukan pendekatan deskriptif analitik karena data diperoleh secara kualitatif, Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah menggunakan metode pengumpulan data (Descriptive Research) memakai sumber karya kepustakaan
Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa (1) Berdasarkan analisis hokumah, kedua tempat kesaksian ru’yat al-hilal di Jepara dan di Cakung sah ditolak karena yang pertama Kemenag RI berpedoman pada Peraturan Presiden Nomor 81 tahun 2009 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Instansi Vertikal Kementerian Agama, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 47 tahun 2009 mengenai Pembentukan dan Organisasi Kementerian Negara, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 24 tahun 2010 tentang Kedudukan, Tugas dan Fungsi Eslon I Kementerian Negara, serta Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 10 tahun 2010 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Agama (Berita Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 2010 nomor 592). Kedua berkaitan dengan SOP, pelaksanaan dikedua tempat tersebut, sehingga Kementerian Agama dalam memutuskan perkara Isbat bergantung kepada para pakar astronomi, falak dan BMKG. Berdasarkan analisis astronomi di kedua tempat, kesaksian ru’yat al-hilal di Jepara dan di Cakung dapat ditolak dikarenakan tidak sesuai dengan kriteria MABIMS, hilal akan tampak bila sudah memenuhi kriteria terebut.
 
ABSTRACT:
The reckoning data produced by Mujab in Jepara resulted in the height of the hilal of 1.5 ° and the hilal being seen in thick fog. After listening to Mujab's testimony, this was considered to be in accordance with the existing procedural law despite protests from many parties. On the other hand, there are two Al-Husainiyah students in Cakung who use the Hisab method from the al-Sulam al-Nayyirain book to produce a 3° hilal height, and the hilal can be seen Studies are intended to answer the problem of Knowing the review of Hukumah regarding the results of the early rukyat Syawal in 2011 AD / 1432 H in Jepara and Cakung, and also Knowing how the astronomical review of the results of the early rukyat Syawal in 2011 AD/1432 H in Jepara and Cakung
This type of research is qualitative. In this study, the author took a descriptive analytical approach because the data was obtained qualitatively, the approach used was to use the data collection method (Descriptive research) using the source of literature work
The results of this study show that (1) Based on legal analysis, the two places of testimony of ru’yat al-hilal in Jepara and in Cakung were legally rejected because the first one of the Ministry of Religion was guided by Presidential Regulation Number 81 of 2009 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of Vertical Agencies of the Ministry of Religion, Presidential Regulation Number 47 of 2009 concerning the Establishment and Organization of state ministries, Presidential Regulation Number 24 of 2010 concerning Position, Duties and Functions of Eslon I of the Ministry of State, as well as Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs Number 10 of 2010 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of the Ministry of Religion (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia in 2010 number 592). The second is related to the SOP, the implementation of the two places, so that the Ministry of Religion in deciding the Isbat case depends on astronomical experts, falak and BMKG. Based on astronomical analysis in both places, the testimony of ru’yat al-hilal in Jepara and in Cakung can be rejected because it does not match the mabims criteria, hilal will appear if it meets the criteria.