Dikotomi antara sains dan agama telah berlangsung sejak abad ke 15 M. Permasalahan itu telah dibahas oleh para peneliti dengan mengajukan teori integrasi antara sains dan agama. Hal itu diilhami oleh Ian Barbour dengan pola relasi sains dan agama yang pada akhirnya terpetakan ke dalam bentuk integrasi. Pada konteks di Indonesia, hal itu dimulai dengan konvergensi IAIN menjadi UIN (Universitas Islam Negeri). UIN Walisongo memiliki paradigma yang khas, disebut sebagai paradigma kesatuan ilmu (Unity of Sciences). Studi ini dilakukan untuk menjawab persoalan: (1) Bagaimana bentuk paradigma kesatuan ilmu UIN Walisongo Semarang? (2) Bagaimana Paradigma Kesatuan Ilmu UIN Walisongo Semarang dalam Perspektif Scientia Sacra SH. Nasr?
Permasalahan tersebut dibahas melalui studi kepustakaan dengan perspektif teori Scientia Sacra S.H. Nasr. Semua data dianalisis dengan metode content analysis. Analisis isi dilakukan dengan mengambil data-data dokumen paradigma kesatuan ilmu UIN Walisongo dan dihubungkan dengan konten teori Scientia Sacra meliputi ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi.
Kajian ini menemukan bahwa: (1) Paradigma Kesatuan Ilmu UIN Semarang memadukan objek kajian dan sumber kajian. Objek kajian meliputi fisik dan non fisik. Pada aspek fisik ditandai dengan simbol berlian yang berisi ilmu kealaman (kauniyah). Pada aspek non fisik UIN Walisongo mempelajari metafisika yang terbukti pada rumpun mata kuliah ilmu kalam, studi Tasawuf, dan Studi al Qur’an dan Hadits. (2) Strategi paradigma kesatuan ilmu UIN Walisongo dalam perspektif Scientia Sacra meliputi: humanisasi ilmu keislaman tidak mengacu kepada Scientia Sacra sementara Spiritualisasi Ilmu Modern adalah sama dengan cita-cita dasar Scientia Sacra yaitu mengantarkan para pengkaji ilmu menuju Tuhan.

ABSTRACT:
The dichotomy between science and religion has been going on since the 15th century AD. This problem has been discussed by researchers by proposing the theory of integration between science and religion. This was inspired by Ian Barbour with a pattern of scientific and religious relations which was eventually mapped into a form of integration. In the context of Indonesia, it begins with the convergence of IAIN to UIN (State Islamic University). UIN Walisongo has a unique paradigm, known as the Unity of Sciences paradigm. This study was conducted to answer the following problems: (1) What is the form of the paradigm for the unity of science at UIN Walisongo Semarang? (2) How the Paradigm of Unity of Science at UIN Walisongo Semarang in the Perspective of Scientia Sacra SH. Nasr?
These problems are discussed through literature study with the perspective of Scientia Sacra. All data were analyzed using content analysis method. Content analysis was carried out by taking data from the paradigm document of the Unity of Science at UIN Walisongo and related to the content of Scientia Sacra's theory including ontology, epistemology, and axiology.
This study found that: (1) The Paradigm of Science Unity in UIN Semarang combines the object of study and the source of the study. The object of study includes physical and non-physical. On the physical aspect, it is marked with a diamond symbol which contains natural knowledge (kauniyah). In the non-physical aspect, UIN Walisongo studies metaphysics which is evident in the subjects of kalam science, tasawuf studies, and al-Qur'an and hadith studies. (2) The paradigm strategy for the unity of science at UIN Walisongo in Scientia Sacra's perspective includes: the humanization of Islamic science does not refer to Scientia Sacra while Spiritualization of Modern Science is the same as Scientia Sacra's basic ideal, namely to lead science reviewers to God.