This thesis discussed about the concept of prohibition of tashabbuh between men and women according to member of PMII and KAMMI UIN Walisongo Semarang.
Understanding the hadith or sunnah is a complicated job, because it needs to know everything that attributed to Muhammad. Either word his deed or his ordinance. That effort for the early Muslim generation does not meet much obstacles, because they are contemporary of Muhammad, so that if there is problem related to the religious and in particular social community, they can refer immediately to the Prophet, in addition the complexity of world problems is relatively simple, so the problem that they face is more simple than modern era today. Growing technology gave rise to new issues that occur in pros and cons give arguments to get it done.
With regard to research the author did, which is about the concept of tashabbuh between men and women according to the member of KAMMI and PMII UIN Walisanga Semarang, then the author attempted to expose the results of research. With the method of descriptive qualitative the comparative method, the author attempted to analyze the results of a questionnaire and interviews which as tool of data collection. In summary, it can be explained that tashabbuh between men and women is a men resembles women or women resembles men. That is on the aspect of jewelry, clothing or behaviour. According to members of the PMII and KAMMI, they forbid men and women resembles each other, it cause can make a man or woman out of his nature.
Although the member of PMII and KAMMI alike forbid someone tashabbuh against its opponents, but in its application, there is a significant difference. It begins on the limitation of tashabbuh between men and women. PMII’s member In determining the concept of tashabbuh between men and women is more contextual. Limitation of tasyabbuh which they specify more inclined to be a locality which compliance with existing norms in a particular area. So limitation decision of tasyabbuh that forbidden on an area will have difference with the prevailing custom. While KAMMI’s member is more textual when determining the concept of tashabbuh between men and women. In addition, they do not pay attention to the quantity-value locality in a certain area. So decision limitation of tashabbuh h that prohibited can be known clearly. Because they are more assertive in its application.